The year 2011. The technical team discovered that the frequent changes were impeding their work as Facebook advertisements grew and included more intriguing features. The entire app has to be realigned as a result of cascading content revisions. The challenges rose proportionately as the team grew in size.
The model was sound, but a user interface (UI) revolution was required. At the same time, Jordan Walke, a programmer at Facebook, developed FaxJS, the original version of React.JS, using XHP (an HTML component library for PHP).
React.JS was implemented for Facebook’s timeline in 2011, which was a significant advancement. A year later, Mark Zuckerberg stated, “The biggest error our business made was relying too heavily on HTML rather than native.”
This marked the framework’s evolution as React Native. Two of the most potent technologies quickly emerged, shocking the developer community – React Native vs React.JS. React seems to be the perfect tool for building scalable web applications, especially when the app is a SPA (single-page application). It is relatively easy to learn and has a clear, concise syntax.
Is it difficult for you to choose between React.JS and React Native? Which one is better? Can you reuse React.JS code in React Native? IntelliSoft has all the answers – just keep on reading this post.
React seems to be the ideal tool for building scalable web applications, especially when the app is a SPA (single page application). It is relatively easy to learn and has a clear, concise syntax.
A hallmark of the library is its focus on components. You can create individual components and afterward easily transfer them from project to project.
Table of Contents
This library hasn’t got a built-in architectural pattern. It uses component-oriented architecture. Its UI’s are rendered by components that act as functions and respond to random data changes. Thus, the internal architecture is a constant interaction between the state of the components and the user’s actions.
Community support is a vital part of any modern technology. Its members provide assistance to both novice and experienced developers.
This library is developed and maintained by Facebook. The company uses it in its projects and releases updates regularly. It means the library has constant community support. It is consistently creating and developing new tools.
There are numerous experienced React developers. According to the recent 2019 Front-End Tooling Survey, about 48% of developers are confident using React.
Another thing, the fresh HackerRank Developer Skills Report found that 33.2% of IT companies are looking to hire React developers. Only 19% are sufficiently qualified, though.
- Very easy to learn. This library is easy to learn due to its simplicity of syntax. As an experienced engineer, you just need to remember HTML to master it quickly. There is no need for an in-depth study. That’s the main difference between React and Angular.
- A virtual DOM (document object model) allows you to organize your HTML, XHTML, or XML documents. This tree of documents is best suited for web browsers to parse various web application elements.
- High level of flexibility.
- If combined with ES6 / 7, the library can handle high loads.
- Linking data from large to small. It can mean a data flow in which children cannot influence the parent data.
- Migrating between versions is very straightforward. Facebook also provides code mods to automate this process.
- It’s lightweight. The data executed on the user’s side can also be presented on the server side at the same time.
No wonder international giants are using this library. The most famous ones include Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Netflix, Airbnb, and Microsoft.
Main Downsides to Consider
- Lack of official documentation. The library’s super-fast development left no room for correct documentation. This can be a little chaotic. Many developers make individual changes to it without a thought-out, systematic approach.
- Big volume. There is almost no difference in the weight of React and Angular.
Remember, React.JS is used to represent a page. You won’t get an event system, data layers, and a sole framework for several assignments.
Choose an Alternative Framework to React.JS
The lightweight, fast, and affordable front-end framework Angular has won the respect of a vast number of developers. It enables you to build interactive and dynamic web applications that require little effort and code. It makes no wonder that many young developers search for the keywords like “react js vs angular” to decide on a better alternative.
Angular is a framework for dynamic web applications that allows HTML to be used as a template language. You can eliminate most of the code you would have to write using data binding and dependency injection.
Vue allows you to split your application code into components and assemble them into a single web application. These components can be reused in any other web application.
- What Is a Secure Software Development Life Cycle? Step-by-Step Guide
- Behind the Buffering: Understanding the Tech Stack for Video Streaming
- RabbitMQ vs Kafka: Choosing the Right Messaging System for Your Needs
- Data Analytics for Business Insights: Benefits, Opportunities, and Key Technologies
- Kubernetes VS Docker: Compare & Contrast Guide
React Native: Alternative Frameworks
Flutter is one of the best alternatives to React JS. It is a great open-source UI toolkit used to create web, mobile, and desktop platforms. Flutter uses a common code base. The code can be written once to run on multiple devices and platforms.
Flutter uses the Dart programming language. It facilitates the development of Android, iOS, and web platforms. The platform allows developers to make changes to Flutter applications and instantly see those changes in the UI. Its app versions use pre-compilation (AOT) on Android and iOS platforms.
Flutter app versions use pre-compilation (AOT) on Android and iOS platforms.
Cordova is one of the best alternatives to React Native. This is an app development framework from Nitobi. The framework was renamed PhoneGap in 2011 by Adobe. The company then released it as an open source edition.
Applications built with Cordova are hybrid and offer similar functionality for both mobile and web platforms. Users can mix hybrid and native code snippets.
Apache Cordova also allows users to use wrappers like Intel XDK and Appery io. The framework has been used to build other well-known frameworks and tools. These include App Builder, Intel XDK, Quasar Framework, and VoltBuilder. It is, without doubt, a popular alternative you should consider.
It’s an open-source development environment used to develop Android, iOS, and Windows applications. It works as an abstraction layer to manage common and platform code. Xamarin uses several features such as memory allocation and collection of garbage. Xamarin is preferred for quality assurance, code sharing, and writing cross-platform C# applications.
Developers can use Xamarin to build apps with their own user interface and share code across multiple platforms. These include Linux, macOS, and Windows. Many specialists prefer Xamarin because of its common C # code base. It’s also preferred for its advanced feature set.
Ionic is a popular software development kit (SDK) used to develop hybrid mobile applications. Ionic was built initially with Angular JS and Apache Cordova. The latest version allows users to choose from a variety of popular interface networks. The framework allows developers to use Ionic components without depending on the UI framework.
Ionic offers the tools and services needed to develop mobile, desktop, hybrid, and progressive web applications that use technologies such as HTML5. It allows developers to develop mobile apps using web technologies and distribute them through their own app stores.
Choosing Between React and Popular Alternatives
If you need to create complex enterprise applications, choose React.JS. It’s easy to learn, usually receives daily updates and enhancements, enjoys corporate support, and has a programmer community to answer any questions. A React.JS application is also easy to scale. A virtual DOM allows you to organize your HTML, XHTML, or XML documents.
React.JS is definitely the better alternative if you want to:
- Have a large selection of flexible libraries, tools, and ecosystems.
- Use the framework together with TypeScript, Flow, BuckleScript.
- Develop a highly scalable web or mobile application.
- Create a high-performance video streaming platform or media site.
Consider using an alternative if you have to think twice because of the lack of official documentation or the big volume. Choose Angular or Vue.
If you need to build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), React Native is the best solution. It is perfect for testing new business hypotheses and offers cool visualization.
React Native has the following advantages:
- Common codebase. In fact, you’re building two versions of one single application for iOS and Android. The code is 65-70% the same.
- It is as similar as possible to the native one. Unlike other cross-platform solutions (Cordova, Ionic), it uses native APIs. It does not mimic the original browser environment.
But remember, React Native is a young framework. Some components are missing, and the technology itself is updated quite frequently.
How We Can Help
Are you lacking the talent to bring your ideas to life? The developers, QA engineers, and designers at IntelliSoft hold expertise in web, mobile, and IoT development, UX/UI design, testing, and many other IT services.
Reach out to us either for a project or your team extension needs!