Let’s imagine you need to develop a mobile app. You may already know that this task requires several specialists, but how much effort do they need to put in to get the project done? Besides, if a developer puts in a lot more hours for the task than are eventually spent, it may give the impression that this specialist is not an expert because the estimate needs to be revised. On the other hand, if the developer doesn’t put in the projected time, they put your project release at risk.
As a rule, estimation is in hours or story points. If the first one is something physical, something you can make a mistake about, story points are about something more abstract.
Typically, software development teams give estimates in time format: hours, days, weeks, and months. Such time estimates are based primarily on personal experience, assumption, or intuition. In such a case, developers look at a task and decide how long it would have taken them. As a result, they are rarely accurate because many factors can affect the timing of the work. That is why many teams working on Agile methodology use story points, and developers from IntelliSoft are no exception.
In this article, we have gathered some powerful insights into what is exactly a story point, turning story points Fibonacci to hours, how to calculate Agile Fibonacci story points to hours, and even story points to hours calculator. Continue reading to understand how to turn agile Fibonacci story points into hours.
Let’s look into two approaches.
Table of Contents
Time Estimation
So, two main approaches exist to estimate the time you need to create a mobile app product.
What Is Agile Time Estimation?
Let’s learn the time estimate meaning. The use of time as a measuring tool is the most common approach. After all, most things, including working hours, important events, and investment portfolios, adhere to a regular schedule. As a result, most product managers, product owners, and key stakeholders are interested in learning how much work a team member can accomplish in a given time interval.
In this manner, management can estimate when to finish a particular work and when the entire project is over. Managers can also hold other team members accountable for their work by using this strategy, which makes it simple to recognize when goals do not meet the allotted time.
Is Time Estimation Perfect?
Since Agile estimation is a group effort, time estimation may be the simplest. Most team members will need help grasping the meaning or use of this standardized corporate measurement. Because of this, groups can more accurately estimate the length of time it will take them to complete an assignment.
Time estimates can be a massive help for many groups and projects but can also be a huge hindrance. In the beginning, there are some jobs for which a timely determination is impossible. This fact may be especially true of highly complicated jobs that are not fully specified. Large tasks, for which time might be readily under or over-estimated, may provide similar challenges.
Time is a common source of stress. If estimations are slightly off, team members and management can be under unneeded stress. Frequently, this tension can result in grave errors or wasted opportunities to produce something extraordinary. Without proper time management, it might hinder performance.
Team Capacity
Hourly estimates are straightforward. However, there are a few factors to think about:
- How much time does the developer spend on the project?
- Does the programmer take part in gatherings unrelated to the project?
- When do sprints occur, and what kind of events are there?
- In how many seconds can we expect to finish the sprint?
- Should we plan for some wiggle room to accommodate last-minute changes to the production?
- Are any vacation time or days off scheduled for the next sprint?
Estimates for narrative points are comparable; the same factors impact the team’s capacity. The first step for developers is to estimate how much work they can complete in a sprint, for example, one more extensive assignment and a few smaller ones. Doing fewer tasks in a sprint allows you to feel comfortable adding a few more from the backlog, which is an excellent exercise for learning your time capacity.
The team often better understands the project and can accurately estimate it after two or three sprints. Then, it is highly likely that they will execute their sprint plan in full.
What Are the Story Points?
What is the story point in Scrum or Agile? A story point is a unit of measure expressing an estimate of the total effort required to implement a particular functionality fully. In other words, it is a kind of relative complexity. Story points are part of the user story pointing.
Teams assign a score in story points based on the complexity of the work, the amount of work, the risk, or the uncertainty. Typically, these values are assigned to break down the work into smaller pieces, eliminating uncertainty.
Over time, it helps teams understand what they can accomplish in a given period and helps them plan more accurately for the following pieces of work.
It may seem utterly illogical to you, but this abstraction is useful: it pushes the team to make tough decisions about the complexity of the work.
How to Calculate Story Points
How to calculate story points in Agile? The answer is “using sprints.” Sprint is a repeatable fixed time interval during which programmers create a specific functionality. At the beginning of development, the team determines how long this time interval is by agreement between the team and the customer. For instance, this period can be two weeks or a month.
As a rule, tasks are estimated at the beginning of the sprint to plan the possible amount of completed work by the end, when managers present the finished work to the customer.
We assign a quantitative value to each item (task) using story points. These quantitative scores themselves are not necessary. What is important is how the scores of the different elements relate. A story given a value of 2 should be twice as big as a story with a value of 1 and correspond to two-thirds of a story with a value of 3.
How many story points per sprint? Instead of one, two, and three, the team could use 100. It is the ratio, not the numbers per se, that matters. Because story points express efforts to accomplish a story, the team must evaluate anything that will affect those efforts, like:
- The amount of work to do
- The complexity of the work
- The risks or uncertainty in getting the job done
When measuring the work with story points, evaluate each of these factors.
The more work that needs to be done, the greater the notional effort figure should be. Consider the development of two web pages. One should have only one field and ask for a name. The second page should have 100 text fields.
The second page should obtain more story points. Maybe not 100 times more, although it has 100 times more fields. After all, there are economies of scale, so in reality, you might only spend 2, 3, or 10 times as much effort on the second page as on the first one.
Second, you need to include risks or uncertainties in work. For example, the team may need to estimate a backlog element the stakeholder can’t say anything about. A similar situation: it is necessary to put a markup on complexity when implementing a feature requires rewriting old unreliable code without autotests.
The uncertainty, as such, reflects in the sequence of numbers for story points, which resembles the Fibonacci sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233.
Finally, consider complexity. Let’s return to our page with 100 fields without interactions between them.
Now imagine another page with 100 fields. Some of them are fields with dates and, respectively, calendar widgets. In the other part, you can enter only a limited number of characters; for example, phone numbers.
There are also fields where the checksum is checked (for example, with bank card numbers). In addition, there are interactions between domains. The page should produce a field with a three-digit CVV code for the Visa card and the American Express card, a four-digit CVV code.
Although there are still 100 fields on the screen, the development will be more complicated and take longer.
Besides, you can use the story point calculator to make this task way easier.
Why Are Story Points Used in Agile?
For one, story points aren’t for an Agile estimate. For instance, the Scrum story points guide specifies that throughout the sprint, it is the exclusive responsibility of the development team to determine how best to implement the value increment resulting from the prioritized stories. They are free to decide how they want to go about it.
What’s the deal with all these Agile story points? Because programmers can use them with minimal effort on your part, with story points, developers can quickly gauge the complexity of impending tasks and plan accordingly.
The team’s confidence in the estimate decreases proportionately with the variable’s value. Nevertheless, despite the simple implementation of the procedure, it does not produce reliable results.
When Story Points Can Go Wrong
- Talking about days
Keep in mind relative effort, complexity, and uncertainty. - Spending an excessive amount of time debating the nuances
Don’t get trapped in the weeds. If there are some “3s” and a “5”, then you shouldn’t spend a great deal of time debating whether or not you should introduce a “4.” - Using the team’s points as leverage against you
Keep in mind that the only specialists who should be considering the points are the product team.
4 Story Point Estimation Methods in Agile
Agile teams use different estimation methods for Agile points, but they all share a common goal: to help teams accurately gauge the effort needed for each project task. Below are four widely adopted techniques, each with its own approach, but all aimed at ensuring that engineering teams can reach a consensus on the effort required for each story in a project.
Planning Poker
Planning poker is an engaging and interactive way to estimate effort, encouraging diverse perspectives within the team. The process begins by breaking the project into cards, each representing a different product feature. These features can vary greatly in complexity, demanding different time and resources. Team members review and discuss each card, sharing their thoughts on how challenging the feature is. After all cards are considered, the team comes to a final agreement on the overall project estimate. This method promotes collaboration and ensures everyone’s input is valued when deciding on project priorities.
T-Shirt Size Estimation
The T-shirt size method offers a simple yet effective way to estimate tasks by assigning sizes to each feature—ranging from XS to XL—depending on the effort required. Instead of diving into specific details for each task, the team groups them by size, which provides a broad perspective on the project’s workload. Afterward, the group reviews and approves these size estimates, ensuring that tasks are properly prioritized and estimates reflect the scope of effort. It’s a great way to assess a project early on without getting lost in the minutiae.
Bucket System
The bucket system organizes tasks into buckets, each representing a different level of complexity. The higher the number of buckets, the more time and effort the task demands. Before placing a task into a bucket, the team discusses the feature’s complexity and resource needs, ensuring that each task is accurately assessed. Once all tasks are sorted, the team has a clear and structured view of the project’s challenges. This method is particularly effective for teams seeking a straightforward, visual way to manage project complexity.
Affinity Mapping
Affinity mapping centers on grouping tasks by their complexity. Team members use their experience to categorize tasks into groups that reflect similar levels of effort. These groups are then discussed to ensure that the estimates align with expectations. This technique highlights the value of team collaboration and experience, as the final distribution of tasks is based on collective judgment.
Aside from these four methods, teams occasionally use dot-voting during sprint planning or retrospectives, particularly for smaller projects. In this approach, project features are displayed on a board, and team members vote by placing dots beside the features they believe will demand the most effort. The more dots a feature receives, the more complex it’s deemed to be. Dot-voting offers a quick, visual means of prioritizing tasks without extended discussions.
What Are Story Points in Jira?
If you’re working with Jira points to hours, it’s important to estimate how long is a story point. Sounds simple enough, right? But tracking the actual time spent can sometimes be a bit tricky. One of the most common approaches to managing this is using time tracking. Jira offers a few ways to set up both estimates and tracking. Here’s how you can get started with Jira story points 1 3, 5:
- Original time estimate. This is where you input how long you think the task will take.
- Log time. When tracking time, use this format – 2w 3d 5h 30m (where w = weeks, d = days, h = hours, m = minutes).
Of course, getting everyone on your team to log their hours consistently can be a challenge, especially with remote teams. But don’t worry—there are a few other options for keeping track of time spent on Jira issues.
If you’re using classic boards, you can take advantage of Jira’s “Days in Column” feature. It shows how many days an issue has been sitting in each column, represented by dots on the card.
For more detailed tracking, you can automate the process using custom fields and Jira story points Fibonacci automation. For instance, if you want to know how long it takes for an issue to move from the start of a sprint to the “Done” status, you can set up an automation rule with an issue transition trigger. This will automatically calculate the time spent by using smart values.
What Are Man Hours?
A man-hour, also called a person-hour, is the job the average worker can do in an hour. With this approach, it is possible to figure out how many hours of continuous work are needed to finish a job. For example, it might take 80 man-hours to do research and write a technical paper, but only ten man-hours to make a family meal from scratch.
Man-hours don’t include the breaks people usually need at work, such as rest, eating, and care for other needs. They only count real work. Managers estimate how long a task will take by adding the hours a person works and the time they take for breaks. So, a tech paper might take 20 hours of work, but it’s unlikely to be ready in twenty hours. Its progress will be slowed by work for other classes, eating, sleeping, and other things people need to do.
How to Calculate Man Hours
What we call “man-hours” is the sum of humans’ time during a given time frame. Understanding how to calculate man-hours is essential for everyone, as it is the basis for measuring the effectiveness of health and safety programs.
Employees’ time spent on a project is significant in making a competitive bid and receiving payment. Accurate time tracking and reporting are critical to the success of any contracting organization because labor costs so much.
Man hours formula = Total hours work a day x Total number of workers x Total number of days worked over the specific period
How to convert 8 story points to hours?
To estimate how many hours 8 story points might represent for your team, you would first need to understand your team’s velocity—how many story points your team can complete in a sprint (typically two weeks). If, after several sprints, you find that your team consistently completes 40 story points per sprint, and you work a standard 40-hour week, you could start to draw correlations for your specific user story points to hours context and will understand how much it is 1 story point is how many hours.
How to convert 13 story points to days?
Converting 13 story points directly into days is not a straightforward or recommended practice in Agile methodologies. Story points are abstract units of measure used to estimate the effort, complexity, and uncertainty of completing tasks, not directly tied to specific time durations like hours or days. hey are deliberately distinct from time-based estimates to account for the variability in work speed and understanding among different team members.
However, teams can use their velocity—a measure of how many story points they can complete in a typical sprint (usually two weeks)—to approximate how long it might take to complete 13 story points. If a team’s velocity is known, you can calculate the duration by comparing the total story points planned for a sprint to the team’s average velocity. For example, if a team has a velocity of 26 story points per two-week sprint, then theoretically, they could complete 13 story points in one week, assuming a linear distribution of work and no significant changes in sprint capacity or task complexity.
How many hours is 1 story point?
The conversion of 1 story point into hours is not standardized and can greatly vary from team to team. Story points represent the complexity, effort, and uncertainty of tasks rather than a specific number of hour. They are a relative measure that allows teams to estimate work in a way that abstracts away from individual capacities and focuses on the task itself.
How to convert 5 story points to hours?
Converting 5 story points to hours Jira is not a straightforward process because story points measure the complexity, effort, and uncertainty of tasks, rather than time. he conversion depends on the team’s unique context, including their velocity, which is the number of story points the team can complete in a sprint, and how this translates into actual working hours based on past performance.
Pros & Cons of Story Points
Let’s look at some reasons to use story points in project estimation:
- You can avoid inaccurate estimates in time intervals.
- You can better account for overhead costs instead of time estimates: communications between team members and the customer, planning, and unforeseen situations.
- Each team will be evaluated on a different scale, meaning their rate (measured in points) will differ.
- By defining a scale for assigning each story point, you can quickly allocate points without much controversy.
Pros:
- Precise time evaluation
The app development team needs time to compute story points’ velocity, but they can determine the launch date once they do. The team knows how many story points they can release in a sprint by tracking velocity. Changes in team members, requirements, or feature number/complexity rarely generate re-estimation issues. - Developer-independent
The developer of your project may sometimes leave and be replaced. They could get sick, decide to take parental leave or a sabbatical, or just quit. Maybe they won’t be good enough for the job.
When they are replaced, the new developer might work at a different pace, so it is necessary to recalculate the number of hours it will take to make. Story points make this less of a problem. Story points are helpful for all developers at a company. - Easy to re-estimate development time
Teams continually monitor their velocity, which is initially highly varied. A team can release five-story point features one week and twenty-story point features the next. Nevertheless, this is merely the beginning. As the project advances, the velocity graph will become more uniform. - Excellent for monitoring team performance
Teams working on the same or similar projects or activities at various periods can simply compare their respective rates of progress using velocity. Are they better now, and if so, how much? Which group or programmer has been struggling and may need additional training? Can you describe the progression of difficulty? Perhaps a different group would fare better. - Reusable for future projects
It is not unheard of for a corporation to specialize in a specific niche (or numerous niches) and construct more than one product with a set of features that are very similar to one another. After finishing even a single project estimated in narrative points, developers can refer to this estimate when working on subsequent projects. This step will cut down on the amount of time needed for story point estimation.
- Precise time evaluation
- Enhances teamwork
Estimating the difficulty of a task using narrative points provides an opportunity for developers working on similar projects to collaborate, which usually does not occur. Working together in such a way offers an excellent opportunity to talk about previous experiences and encourage one another.
Cons:
- More complex to budget
Programmers invest effort in a project beyond just coding (or making designs and testing). Finding information, having conversations (both internally and with the client), making adjustments, etc., all take time. Points for a story do not account for the time spent estimating those points, even when that time is spent on the project.
Although creating a budget using story points is feasible, the time-and-money method is typically more efficient. - More than one developer needed
The story points model is appealing because it is based on facts and can be used to predict the future. However, for that to be true, more than one developer must do the story point estimation. Story points don’t have as many benefits for small companies with only one team or companies with only one expert in a field, like a single designer or iOS developer. Small businesses like these usually use worker hours as a way to estimate. - Considerable backlog required
Your team will need to invest a lot of time to maximize the potential of story points. The first two to three sprints of a project with features the team hasn’t worked on before (or hasn’t worked on full-time) may be challenging to forecast in terms of performance. Given the wealth of statistical data, it is true that the more backlog items your teams have, the more accurate their estimations can be. However, the system for story points is not yet fully operational. - Estimated velocity per team
This parameter indicates that you will need to calculate the velocity for each combination of developers on a project-by-project basis if teams switch between different projects. As a result, an accurate estimate for one team may not be valid for another team, and the addition or removal of a single member of a team is enough to render previous incorrect estimates.
How to Convert Story Points to Hours (Story Points To Hours Calculator)
Customers may request a story points Fibonacci to hours conversion from an estimating team that uses story points. Still, some people won’t understand what “story points” are.
The time and energy invested in completing tasks is a significant factor in complexity-based estimation. Yet, the time invested does not necessarily reflect the amount of work. Hours deal with doubt in a more nebulous way than plot points. Therefore, it’s impossible to give a precise answer to a client who asks how many hours a story point equates.
Developers can use the Fibonacci sequence to allocate story points in a way that will somewhat accommodate for uncertainty in development times; however, the story points Fibonacci to hours only allow for a direct Fibonacci story points to hours conversion.
Let’s say it takes two hours to finish a base story with one story point.
In the best case, it might take 26 hours to write a 13-story point story if nothing goes wrong or gets in the way. For example, if the API works well from one endpoint to the next. If it doesn’t, the story could take 30 to 50 hours, depending on how many things don’t match up. If the developer hasn’t worked with the API in question yet, no one can tell in advance how it will go.
Jira is a popular project management and issue-tracking tool used in software development and various other fields. In Jira, “story points” and “hours” are two different ways to estimate the effort or complexity of tasks, typically in Agile development.
Teams may sometimes want to convert Jira story points to hours or vice versa to provide more detailed planning or reporting. However, it’s important to note that this conversion is not straightforward and can vary from team to team. The actual relationship between story points and hours depends on the team’s historical performance and understanding of the work.
It’s also worth mentioning that many Agile teams prefer using story points for high-level estimation and planning while using hours for more detailed, day-to-day tracking. However, there’s no universally accepted formula for story point to hours conversion, as it depends on the specific context and the team’s established practices.
Converting Jira story points to hours can be a bit tricky because it’s not an exact science. Story point to hours conversion factor can vary from team to team based on their historical performance. However, you can use the following general guidelines as a starting point for story points Jira to hours:
- Understand Your Team’s Velocity. Velocity measures how many story points a team can complete in a given time, often measured in sprints (e.g., two weeks). Calculate your team’s average velocity by looking at past sprints. For example, if your team typically completes 20 story points in a two-week sprint, your velocity is 20 story points.
- Estimate in Hours. To convert story points Agile to hours, you need to estimate the average number of hours one story point represents for your team. You can do this by looking at how many hours it takes to complete tasks with different story point values. For instance, if you find that, on average, a 2-story point task takes about 8 hours, a 5-story point task takes 20 hours, and so on, you can estimate that 1 story point is roughly equivalent to 4 hours.
- Apply the Conversion Factor. Once you have your average hours per story point, you can apply this factor to convert story points to hours. For example, if you have a task estimated at 8 story points, you can estimate that it will take approximately 32 hours to complete (8 story points * 4 hours per story point).
Remember that this is a rough estimate, and it may not be entirely accurate. Story points are meant to be a more abstract measure of relative complexity, and the purpose of converting them to hours is often for more detailed planning or time tracking. However, when converting Agile story points to hours, it’s important to be flexible and adjust your estimates as you gather more data and learn from your team’s actual performance. The Agile story points to hours conversion factor may change over time as your team becomes more experienced and consistent in their estimations.
Mistakes to Avoid
Unfortunately, story points are often misused. They can go wrong when used to estimate people, detail timelines and resources, and when mistaken for a productivity measure.
Instead, teams need to use them to understand the amount/complexity of work in each task and prioritize them. The parts rated as more strenuous should be in work first so that they are ready before the sprint’s end, and the easier ones postponed. In particular, be aware of the following pitfalls:
- Including story points in bugs
- Revising problem estimates during the sprint by converting story points into hours/stakeholder value
- Being frightened of the leader or the expert
- Reiterating a focus on open questions
- Thinking, “It’s worth x points if I do it and y points if I don’t”
To avoid these mistakes, check outstaffing companies with vast experience in working with both man hours and story sizing.
H2: Pros & Cons of Man Hours
Pros:
- Clients frequently pay for hours
This model requires very little explanation. Estimations based on complexity can sometimes be challenging to understand for customers. In addition, if the customer places a higher priority on the project’s cost than it does the launch date (typically the case), story points won’t be of any use to them. - Man-hour is a familiar model
Estimating a worker’s hours is not foreign to developers or their customers. It takes some time to be innovative. Many people subscribe to the philosophy that “if it ain’t broke, don’t change it.” Moving to another approach is possible if the method provides accurate estimates. - One developer can do an hours-based estimation
Story points are primarily ineffective for small teams and freelancers because they require various points of view. Without a reference, estimating using story points is a burdensome endeavor. On the other hand, hours provide the developer working on the project with a method for self-estimating with reasonable precision.
Cons:
- Hard to estimate huge tasks in hours
It’s not hard for developers with experience to provide an estimate for a little assignment. However, the greater the work, the greater the number of internal and external factors that can hinder progress. Hours-based estimates are less precise because they lack the leeway of story points. - Being solely responsible for the assessment
On the one hand, calculating your own time needs may be more straightforward because you have to account for yourself. On the other hand, it’s a major setback if you don’t meet your projections. - Almost no flexibility
Time estimation based on hours is highly rigorous. The developer determines hourly assessment. If a product development team member leaves in the middle of the project, the team will need to recalculate each affected user story still in progress or slated for future sprints. Depending on the level of the project and the gap in expertise between the original and replacement developer, it might be a substantial undertaking. - A developer’s estimate is less precise than a team’s
Some programmers have the terrible habit of overestimating their abilities and setting deadlines that they find challenging. This step not only throws a wrench into the development process (which may result in additional costs for the team if there are penalties) but also leads to stress and exhaustion for the developers.
Which One Is Better: Story Point vs. Man Hours
Several factors may help us to define the winner in the story points vs hours battle.
Excellent for high-level estimation
Story Points are an indispensable method for the first estimation. Whereas it is easier to estimate a User Story in hours with a transparent data model and precise requirements, Story Points help you comprehend the job scope, at least at a high level.
Story Points are a helpful estimation tool since they allow you to take into account a wide range of variables, including those resulting from interactions with external services. As story point estimation allows the team to consider any uncertainty linked to the work item estimated, it is the most sensible option to take if you want to integrate an API but don’t have access to the API documentation.
Tracking velocity
Velocity enhances Story Points estimation. Velocity is a sophisticated capacity planning approach that shows how much product backlog effort a software development team can handle in a sprint. Team velocity is the goal. Post-sprint retrospectives focus on increasing velocity. The team’s velocity determines its speed and efficiency.
However, velocity is a relative value that can change throughout the project. The next advantage is that you will not have to re-estimate your project if the velocity changes, whereas estimating in man-hours would necessitate a recalculation.
No correlation with the skills/experience of the estimator
As previously indicated, a specialist who estimates a task is not always responsible for its execution. Senior and junior developers require different intervals to finish the same task. The best way to avoid this is to have the same developer estimate and implement a project.
Story Points, a team-wide measurement, solve this issue. The estimate is independent of the team member. Differently skilled developers can discuss it and reach a consensus. The staff can understand story size and complexity.
Flexibility
The ability to re-plan product release dates without having to re-estimate all jobs is another advantage provided by Story Points. This benefit is beneficial in situations where team members need to be replaced.
It is common practice for one individual to provide an estimate for a job while others carry out the actual work. In this particular scenario, Story Points are essential.
Related readings:
- Innovation Roadmap: When to Use a Proof of Concept or Prototype
- Assembling Your Dream Design Team: A Comprehensive Guide
- 11 Software Developer Soft Skills Every Programmer Needs to Succeed
- Advantages of Using Kubernetes Containers in Your Product
- What’s a Proof of Concept? The Complete Beginner’s Guide
How to Convert Agile Points to Hours?
Converting sprint points to hours isn’t an exact science, and each team’s approach can differ depending on their experience. However, there are some simple guidelines you can use to help estimate how sprint story points to hours can be translated.
Understand Your Team’s Velocity
Velocity is the total number of story point numbers your team completes in a sprint, typically spanning two weeks. To determine this, look back at your past sprints. For example, if your team usually completes 30 story points in a two-week period, that means your velocity is 30 average story points per sprint.
H3: Estimate Time per Story Point
You can do this by tracking the time spent on tasks of various point values. For instance:
- A 3-point task might take around 15 hours
- A 6-point task could take about 30 hours
From here, you can estimate that each story point agile is roughly equivalent to 5 hours of work.
Use Your Conversion Factor
Once you’ve established an average number of hours per story point, apply it to your agile estimating story points to hours. So, if a task is rated at 10 story points example and your team’s average is 4 hours per point, you’d expect it to take around 40 hours to complete.
Remember, these are just estimates on how to convert Scrum story points to hours. As you continue to gather more data and learn from your team’s performance, you may need to adjust this conversion over time. Staying flexible is essential for improving the accuracy of your estimates of sprint points to hours.
